Journal
JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cem.3028
Keywords
loadings; NIPALS; partial least squares discriminant analysis; PLS1; scores; weights
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Two common algorithms for partial least squares discriminant analysis developed by Wold (NIPALS) and by Martens are compared. Although their classification performance is identical, their projections into variable space (often called scores) and into object space (loadings and weights) are quite different. Martens' algorithm can be visualised as a rotation in variable space, but Wold's results in quite complex distortions. Most software presents scores plots using the Wold algorithm but fails to appreciate that variable space is distorted, so scores from both algorithms are different. Weights, which can be obtained from both methods, are identical, although loadings (as commonly defined) from the Wold algorithm differ. The paper illustrates the two methods graphically to review the difference between these two methods.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available