4.5 Article

Determination of optimum number of components in partial least squares regression from distributions of the root-mean-squared error obtained by Monte Carlo resampling

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cem.2993

Keywords

model dimension; model selection; model validation; Monte Carlo resampling; PLS regression

Funding

  1. Forde Health Trust
  2. Norges Forskningsrad [221047/F40]
  3. Norwegian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monte Carlo resampling is utilized to determine the number of components in partial least squares (PLS) regression. The data are randomly and repeatedly divided into calibration and validation samples. For each repetition, the root-mean-squared error (RMSE) is determined for the validation samples for a=1, 2, ... , A PLS components to provide a distribution of RMSE values for each number of PLS components. These distributions are used to determine the median RMSE for each number of PLS components. The component (A(min)) having the lowest median RMSE is located. The fraction p of the RMSE values of A(min) exceeding the median RMSE for the preceding component is determined. This fraction p represents a probability measure that can be used to decide if the RMSE for the A(min) PLS component is significantly lower than the RMSE for the preceding component for a preselected threshold (p(upper)). If so, it defines the optimum number of PLS components. If not, the process is repeated for the previous components until significance is achieved. The p(upper)=0.5 implies that the median is used for selecting the optimum number of components. The RMSE is approximately normally distributed on the smallest components. This can be utilized to relate p to a fraction of a standard deviation. For instance, p=0.308 corresponds to half a standard deviation if RMSE is normally distributed. The approach is demonstrated for calibration of metabolomics measurements and spectroscopic mixture data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available