4.7 Article

Quantitative Prediction of Optical Absorption in Molecular Solids from an Optimally Tuned Screened Range-Separated Hybrid Functional

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 2919-2929

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01058

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. VATAT postdoctoral fellowship by the Government of Israel
  2. Weizmann Institute of Science
  3. US Air Force
  4. NSF-BSF program
  5. National Science Foundation [DMR-1708892]
  6. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We show that fundamental gaps and optical spectra of molecular solids can be predicted quantitatively and nonempirically within the framework of time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) using the recently developed optimally tuned screened range-separated hybrid (OT-SRSH) functional approach. In this scheme, the electronic structure of the gas-phase molecule is determined by optimal tuning of the range-separation parameter in a range-separated hybrid functional. Screening and polarization in the solid state are taken into account by adding long-range dielectric screening to the functional form, with the modified functional used to perform self-consistent periodic-boundary calculations for the crystalline solid. We provide a comprehensive benchmark for the accuracy of our approach by considering the X23 set of molecular solids and comparing results obtained from TDDFT with those obtained from many-body perturbation theory in the GW-BSE approximation. We additionally compare results obtained from dielectric screening computed within the random-phase approximation to those obtained from the computationally more efficient many-body dispersion approach and find that this influences the fundamental gap but has little effect on the optical spectra. Our approach is therefore robust and can be used for studies of molecular solids that are typically beyond the reach of computationally more intensive methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available