4.6 Article

FAINT POPULATION III SUPERNOVAE AS THE ORIGIN OF THE MOST IRON-POOR STARS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 792, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/792/2/L32

Keywords

stars: abundances; stars: Population III; supernovae: general

Funding

  1. Scientific Research of the JSPS [23224004, 23540262, 26400222]
  2. WPI Initiative
  3. MEXT, Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23740157, 23224004, 26400222, 13J07047, 23540262] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The most iron-poor stars in the Milky Way provide important observational clues to the astrophysical objects that enriched the primordial gas with heavy elements. Among them, the recently discovered iron-deficient star SMSS J031300.36-670839.3 shows a remarkable chemical composition with a non-detection of iron ([Fe/H] < -7.1) and large enhancement of carbon and magnesium relative to calcium. We investigate supernova yields of metal-free ( Population III) stars to interpret the abundance pattern observed in this star. We report that the high [C/Ca] and [C/Mg] ratios and upper limits of other elemental abundances are well reproduced with the yields of core-collapse supernovae ( which have normal kinetic energies of explosion E of E-51 = E/10(51) erg = 1) and hypernovae ( E-51 >= 10) of Population III 25 M-circle dot or 40 M-circle dot stars. The best-fit models assume that the explosions undergo extensive matter mixing and fallback, leaving behind a black hole remnant. In these models, Ca is produced by static/explosive O burning and incomplete Si burning in the Population III supernova/hypernova, in contrast to the suggestion that Ca is originated from the hot-CNO cycle during pre-supernova evolution. Chemical abundances of four carbon-rich iron-poor stars with [Fe/H] < -4.5, including SMSS J031300.36-670839.3, are consistently explained by faint supernova models with ejected masses of Ni-56 less than 10(-3) M-circle dot

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available