4.7 Article

Charge fluctuation effects on the shape of flexible polyampholytes with applications to intrinsically disordered proteins

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 149, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5035428

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health [CHE 16-36424, R01 GM107703]
  3. Collie-Welch Foundation [F-0019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Random polyampholytes (PAs) contain positively and negatively charged monomers that are distributed randomly along the polymer chain. The interaction between charges is assumed to be given by the Debye-Huckel potential. We show that the size of the PA is determined by an interplay between electrostatic interactions, giving rise to the polyelectrolyte effect due to net charge per monomer (sigma) and an effective attractive PA interaction due to charge fluctuations, delta sigma. The interplay between these terms gives rise to non-monotonic dependence of the radius of gyration, R-g, on the inverse Debye length, kappa, when PA effects are important (delta sigma/sigma > 1). In the opposite limit, R-g decreases monotonically with increasing kappa. Simulations of PA chains, using a charged bead-spring model, further corroborate our theoretical predictions. The simulations unambiguously show that conformational heterogeneity manifests itself among sequences that have identical PA parameters. A clear implication is that the phases of PA sequences, and by inference intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), cannot be determined using only the bare PA parameters (sigma and delta sigma). The theory is used to calculate the changes in Rg on N, the number of residues for a set of IDPs. For a certain class of IDPs, with N between 24 and 441, the size grows as R-g similar to N-0.6, which agrees with data from small angle X-ray scattering experiments. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available