4.5 Article

Relationship between waxy (high amylopectin) and high protein digestibility traits in sorghum and malting quality

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 319-327

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2017.11.015

Keywords

Amylopectin; Malting; Protein digestibility; Sorghum

Funding

  1. Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Collaborative Research on Sorghum and Millet (SMIL) through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) [AID-OAA-A-13-00047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study determined the relationship between waxy (high amylopectin) and high protein digestibility (HD) traits in sorghum and malting quality with the aim of replacing barley malt in arid, tropical regions. Eight sorghum lines with differing endosperm traits: waxy, heterowaxy, waxy-HD, non-waxy-HD and non-waxy-normal digestibility traits were malted at a laboratory scale and their malt quality and modification during malting were studied. Malt from waxy and heterowaxy sorghum lines generally had improved endosperm modification and starch granule degradation. Only non-waxy-HD and one waxy line malts exhibited clear evidence of endosperm protein degradation. Malt a.-amylase activity of the sorghum lines varied more than 13-amylase activity but neither were evidently affected by the traits. Malt from waxy lines had improved HWE and FAN. Principal component analysis showed that waxy lines were associated with high HWE, FAN, starch and protein loss. The improved malt quality was probably due to the better starch granule swelling property of amylopectin which could have facilitated hydrolysis by amylases and proteases. This study shows that although beta-amylase activity is not affected by the waxy trait, white tan-plant waxy sorghum produces higher quality malt than regular sorghum and has potential as a better partial barley malt replacement for brewing. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available