4.5 Article

Sexual dimorphism in the width of the mouse synaptonemal complex

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.212548

Keywords

Super-resolution microscopy; Meiosis; Synaptonemal complex; SIM; STORM

Categories

Funding

  1. Horizon 2020 [634113]
  2. Vetenskapsradet (Swedish Research Council) [K2013-54X-21397-04-5]
  3. Cancerfonden (Swedish Cancer Society) [170226]
  4. Karolinska Institutet
  5. Hospital Infantil de Mexico [2016-096]
  6. Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigacion e Innovacion Tecnologica [IN225917]
  7. National Microscopy Infrastructure [VR-RFI2016-00968]
  8. Stiftelsen for Strategisk Forskning (Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research) [RIF14-0091]
  9. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) [RIF14-0091] Funding Source: Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sexual dimorphism has been used to describe morphological differences between the sexes, but can be extended to any biologically related process that varies between males and females. The synaptonemal complex (SC) is a tripartite structure that connects homologous chromosomes in meiosis. Here, aided by superresolution microscopy techniques, we show that the SC is subject to sexual dimorphism, in mouse germ cells. We have identified a significantly narrower SC in oocytes and have established that this difference does not arise from a different organization of the lateral elements nor from a different isoform of transverse filament protein SYCP1. Instead, we provide evidence for the existence of a narrower central element and a different integration site for the C-termini of SYCP1, in females. In addition to these female-specific features, we speculate that post-translation modifications affecting the SYCP1 coiled-coil region could render a more compact conformation, thus contributing to the narrower SC observed in females.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available