4.8 Article

Internal field Co-59 NMR study of cobalt-iron nanoparticles during the activation of CoFe2/CaO catalyst for carbon nanotube synthesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 358, Issue -, Pages 62-70

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.11.025

Keywords

Cobalt-iron alloy; Catalysts; Induction period; Activation; Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; Co-59 NMR

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [17-53-150018]
  2. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis [0303-2016-0002]
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [K3-2017-040]
  4. French Embassy in Moscow
  5. Societe des Amis de l'ESPCI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CoFe2/CaO catalysts for multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) were characterized during the activation period (T = 670 degrees C; C2H4/Ar = 1:1, 400 sccm) by internal field Co-59 nuclear magnetic resonance. During this induction period, although C2H4 is already reacting, the MWCNT yield remains negligible. The NMR spectra of the catalysts revealed the occurrence of several structural and magnetic species. They were not detectable by conventional X-ray diffraction but the heterogeneity of the metal particles was corroborated by high-resolution transmission electronic microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Two samples quenched at different activation time contained, beside non-reacted pure metal Co particles, strong and weak ferromagnetic alloys. During activation, the pure Co metal content dropped and an increase of the ordering of the cobalt-iron alloy in the catalyst was evidenced thus revealing a multistage activation mechanism for the reaction. We propose this ordering process during the induction period to be an intermediate step between the strong ferromagnetic Co rich alloy and the weak ferromagnetic Fe rich one and that it favors the onset of MWCNTs growth. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available