3.8 Proceedings Paper

A typical solar-coal hybrid power plant in China

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.188

Keywords

Solar-Coal Hybrid Power Plant; Mid-Temperature Solar Heat; Cost-Effective

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a 330 MW coal-fired power plant hybridized with solar heat, which will be demonstrated in Sinkiang province of China. In this solar hybrid plant, solar heat at around 300 degrees C is used to replace the steam extracted from the high-pressure turbine, to pre-heat the feed water before the economizer of the boiler. In this way, the replaced high-temperture and pressure steam can be further expanded in the turbine, boosting output work of the coal-fired power plant. At the same time, compared to present solar-only thermal power technology, the solar heat at around 300 degrees C here can be converted into electricity by the aid of larger capacity units of the coal-fired plant with higher turbine internal efficiency. Furthermore, this kind of solar hybrid power plant can be operated at a fully rated output during periods of low solar radiation such as the evening and overcast days without storage device. As a result, the annual net solar-to-electric efficiency could reach up to 21%, with the improvement of nearly 3 percentage points, compared to the state-of-the art parabolic trough plants, such as SEGSs. And the levelized cost of electricity generation (LCOE) could be reduced to 0.8-1.0 Upsilon/kWh, about 20-30% lower than that of the solar-only thermal power plant (1.1-1.3 Upsilon/kWh). This kind of solar-coal hybrid power plant would offer a promissing approach to the cost-effective and scalable utilization of mid-temperature solar heat in the near and mid term. (C) 2013 H. Jin. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available