4.7 Article

EXPANSION TECHNIQUES FOR COLLISIONLESS STELLAR DYNAMICAL SIMULATIONS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 792, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/98

Keywords

stars: kinematics and dynamics

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M530471]
  2. Ministry of Finance of People's Republic of China [ZDY Z2008-2]
  3. Recruitment Program of Global Experts (Qianren)
  4. NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China) [11073025]
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0847696] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present graphics processing unit (GPU) implementations of two fast force calculation methods based on series expansions of the Poisson equation. One method is the self-consistent field (SCF) method, which is a Fourier-like expansion of the density field in some basis set; the other method is the multipole expansion (MEX) method, which is a Taylor-like expansion of the Green's function. MEX, which has been advocated in the past, has not gained as much popularity as SCF. Both are particle-field methods and optimized for collisionless galactic dynamics, but while SCF is a pure expansion, MEX is an expansion in just the angular part; thus, MEX is capable of capturing radial structure easily, while SCF needs a large number of radial terms. We show that despite the expansion bias, these methods are more accurate than direct techniques for the same number of particles. The performance of our GPU code, which we call ETICS, is profiled and compared to a CPU implementation. On the tested GPU hardware, a full force calculation for one million particles took similar to 0.1 s (depending on expansion cutoff), making simulations with as many as 10(8) particles fast for a comparatively small number of nodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available