4.6 Article

UP TO 100,000 RELIABLE STRONG GRAVITATIONAL LENSES IN FUTURE DARK ENERGY EXPERIMENTS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 793, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/793/1/L10

Keywords

cosmology: observations; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: starburst; infrared: galaxies; submillimeter: galaxies

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J001597/1]
  2. STFC [ST/J001597/1, ST/L000776/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000776/1, ST/J001597/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Euclid space telescope will observe similar to 10(5) strong galaxy-galaxy gravitational lens events in its wide field imaging survey over around half the sky, but identifying the gravitational lenses from their observed morphologies requires solving the difficult problem of reliably separating the lensed sources from contaminant populations, such as tidal tails, as well as presenting challenges for spectroscopic follow-up redshift campaigns. Here I present alternative selection techniques for strong gravitational lenses in both Euclid and the Square Kilometre Array, exploiting the strong magnification bias present in the steep end of the H alpha luminosity function and the HI mass function. Around 10(3) strong lensing events are detectable with this method in the Euclid wide survey. While only similar to 1% of the total haul of Euclid lenses, this sample has similar to 100% reliability, known source redshifts, high signal-to-noise, and a magnification-based selection independent of assumptions of lens morphology. With the proposed Square Kilometre Array dark energy survey, the numbers of reliable strong gravitational lenses with source redshifts can reach 10(5).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available