4.5 Article

A protocol for variable-resolution first-order reversal curve measurements

Journal

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 1364-1377

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014GC005680

Keywords

first-order reversal curve; FORC diagram; irregular grid; signal-to-noise ratio

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP11010541, DP120103952, DP140104544]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-resolution first-order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams are being increasingly used in rock and environmental magnetism, including for detection of biomagnetic signals in sediments. Resolution can be a major barrier to obtaining high-quality FORC diagrams, and time-consuming measurements that employ small field steps are necessary to resolve the finest features of a FORC distribution. We present a new experimental protocol with irregularly spaced field steps that allow different parts of a FORC diagram to be measured at different resolutions. Larger numbers of measurements can, therefore, be made in key regions of a FORC distribution to resolve diagnostic features at higher resolution. Specification of the field steps in the irregular measurement grid is based on major hysteresis properties; no a priori knowledge concerning the underlying FORC distribution is required. FORC diagrams obtained with conventional measurements and with our new measurement protocol give consistent results. Because of its variable resolution, the irregular protocol provides a clear representation of fine-scale features produced by quasireversible superparamagnetic and noninteracting single-domain particles. Although the proposed irregular measurement protocol is not as efficient at suppressing noise as recently developed postprocessing techniques (e.g., VARIFORC), it enables efficient high-resolution analysis for relatively strongly magnetized samples where measurement noise is not detrimental to FORC distribution estimation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available