4.7 Article

Catalytic oxidation of styrene to benzaldehyde over a copper Schiff-base/SBA-15 catalyst

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 35, Issue 10, Pages 1716-1726

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60131-5

Keywords

Copper(II) Schiff base; SBA-15; Styrene oxidation; Benzaldehyde; Heterogeneous catalysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The amino-modified mesoporous material SBA-15 (NH2-SBA-15) was prepared via co-condensation of tetraethylorthosilicate with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane in the presence of an amphiphilic triblock copolymer as a pore-directing agent under acidic conditions. The SBA-15-supported Cu Schiff-base complex (Cu-SBA-15) was then synthesized by condensation of salicylaldehyde with NH2-SBA-15, followed by the addition of a solution of Cu(NO3)(2). The supported complex was systematically characterized by elemental analysis, inductive coupled high frequency plasma atomic emission spectrometry, powder X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, field scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, N-2 absorption-desorption, and thermo gravimetric analysis, and was used as the catalyst for the selective oxidation of styrene to benzaldehyde. The influence of the reaction parameters was assessed. The maximum conversion of styrene was 84.4% and the selectivity for benzaldehyde was 83.9%, when the reaction was conducted with a 2:1 molar ratio of H2O2:styrene in the presence of 3.8 wt% catalyst at 100 degrees C for 8 h. The TOF was 261.1 h(-1), and the catalyst could be used three times without significant loss of activity. The uniformly sized pore channels, high specific surface area, and well-distributed active centers of the catalyst may contribute to the high activity. (C) 2014, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available