4.7 Article

Oxford Nanopore sequencing, hybrid error correction, and de novo assembly of a eukaryotic genome

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 1750-1756

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.191395.115

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DBI-1350041, IOS-1032105]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01-HG006677]
  3. Cancer Center Support grant [CA045508]
  4. T. and V. Stanley
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1627442] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monitoring the progress of DNA molecules through a membrane pore has been postulated as a method for sequencing DNA for several decades. Recently, a nanopore-based sequencing instrument, the Oxford Nanopore MinION, has become available, and we used this for sequencing the Saccharomyces cereyisiae genome. To make use of these data, we developed a novel open-source hybrid error correction algorithm Nanocorr specifically for Oxford Nanopore reads, because existing packages were incapable of assembling the long read lengths (5-50 kbp) at such high error rates (between similar to 5% and 40% error). With this new method, we were able to perform a hybrid error correction of the nanopore reads using complementary MiSeq data and produce a de novo assembly that is highly contiguous and accurate: The contig N50 length is more than ten times greater than an Illumina-only assembly (678 kb versus 59.9 kbp) and has >99.88% consensus identity when compared to the reference. Furthermore, the assembly with the long nanopore reads presents a much more complete representation of the features of the genome and correctly assembles gene cassettes, rRNAs, transposable elements, and other genomic features that were almost entirely absent ill the II lumina-only assembly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available