4.7 Article

THE MASS OF THE BLACK HOLE IN LMC X-3

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 794, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/154

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; stars: black holes; stars: variables: general; X-rays: binaries; X-rays: individual (LMC X-3)

Funding

  1. NASA [HST-HF-51315.01, NNX11AD08G]
  2. NASA Guest Observer Program
  3. National Science Foundation [AST 0407063, AST 070707]
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000733/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. STFC [ST/L000733/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyze a large set of new and archival photometric and spectroscopic observations of LMC X-3 to arrive at a self-consistent dynamical model for the system. Using echelle spectra obtained with the Magellan Inamori Kyocera Echelle instrument on the 6.5 m Magellan Clay telescope and the UVES instrument on the second 8.2 m Very Large Telescope, we find a velocity semiamplitude for the secondary star of K-2 = 241.1 +/- 6.2 kms(-1), where the uncertainty includes an estimate of the systematic error caused by X-ray heating. Using the spectra, we also find a projected rotational velocity of V-rot sin i = 118.5 +/- 6.6 kms(-1). From an analysis of archival B and V light curves as well as new B and V light curves from the SMARTS 1.3 m telescope, we find an inclination of i = 69 degrees.84 +/- 0 degrees.37 for models that do not include X-ray heating and an inclination of i = 69 degrees.24 +/- 0 degrees.72 for models that incorporate X-ray heating. Adopting the latter inclination measurement, we find masses of 3.63 +/- 0.57 M-circle dot and 6.98 +/- 0.56 M-circle dot for the companion star and the black hole, respectively. We briefly compare our results with earlier work and discuss some of their implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available