4.6 Article

Differential diagnosis of Bartter syndrome, Gitelman syndrome, and pseudo-Bartter/Gitelman syndrome based on clinical characteristics

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 180-188

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.56

Keywords

Bartter syndrome; Gitelman syndrome; pseudo-Bartter; pseudo-Gitelman; salt-losing tubulopathy

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan [H24-nanchitou (nan)-ippan-041]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [25893131]
  3. Mother and Child Health Foundation [25-7]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K09694, 25893131, 26461618] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Phenotypic overlap exists among type III Bartter syndrome (BS), Gitelman syndrome (GS), and pseudo-BS/GS -(p-BS/GS), which are clinically difficult to distinguish. We aimed to clarify the differences between these diseases, allowing accurate diagnosis based on their clinical features. Methods: A total of 163 patients with genetically defined type III BS (n = 30), GS (n = 90), and p-BS/GS (n = 43) were included. Age at diagnosis, sex, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and serum and urine electrolyte concentrations were determined. Results: Patients with p-BS/GS were significantly older at diagnosis than those with type III BS and GS. Patients with p-BS/GS included a significantly higher percentage of women and had a lower body mass index and estimated glomerular filtration rate than did patients with GS. Although hypomagnesemia and hypocalciuria were predominant biochemical findings in patients with GS, 17 and 23% of patients with type III BS and p-BS/GS, respectively, also showed these abnormalities. Of patients with type III BS, GS, and p-BS/GS, 40, 12, and 63%, respectively, presented with chronic kidney disease. Conclusions: This study clarified the clinical differences between BS, GS, and p-BS/GS for the first time, which will help clinicians establish differential diagnoses for these three conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available