4.7 Article

Temocillin against Enterobacteriaceae isolates from community-acquired urinary tract infections: low rate of resistance and good accuracy of routine susceptibility testing methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 73, Issue 7, Pages 1848-1853

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Temocillin is an old 'revived' antibiotic that may play an important role in the treatment of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI). Data regarding its activity against current Enterobacteriaceae isolates as well as the performance of routine susceptibility testing methods are, however, scarce. Objectives: To determine the MICs of temocillin for Enterobacteriaceae strains reflecting the current epidemiology and to analyse the accuracy of three commercial methods. Methods: Enterobacteriaceae isolates causing community-acquired UTI were prospectively collected from September 2015 to January 2017 in two French centres. Temocillin MIC was determined by agar dilution (AD) as the reference method and then compared with: (i) susceptibility testing by disc diffusion; (ii) MIC determination by Etest; and (iii) MIC estimation by the Vitek 2 automated system. Results: A total of 762 Enterobacteriaceae were analysed comprising 658 (86.4%) Escherichia coli and 37 (4.9%) ESBL-producing isolates. Susceptibility rate assessed by AD was 99.6% according to the 8 mg/L clinical breakpoint and was significantly lower against the ESBL-producing isolates than the non-ESBL-producing isolates (94.6% versus 99.9%, P< 0.01). The MIC50 and MIC90 for the total set were 3 and 6 mg/L, respectively. According to the 8 mg/L clinical breakpoint, the major error rate was <1% for disc diffusion and Etest, and significantly higher for Vitek 2 (4.3%, P< 0.01), but still low. No very major error was noticed. Conclusions: Temocillin showed a high level of activity against Enterobacteriaceae from community-acquired UTI and good to excellent reliability of routine methods for susceptibility testing in such a setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available