4.6 Article

Sensitivity of the WRF model to the lower boundary in an extreme precipitation event - Madeira island case study

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 2009-2025

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-14-2009-2014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FEDER funds through Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade COMPETE
  2. Portuguese national funds through FCT Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, within the framework of Project Urban Atmospheric Quality, Climate Change and Resilience [EXCL/AAG-MAA/0383/2012]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [EXCL/AAG-MAA/0383/2012] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The advances in satellite technology in recent years have made feasible the acquisition of high-resolution information on the Earth's surface. Examples of such information include elevation and land use, which have become more detailed. Including this information in numerical atmospheric models can improve their results in simulating lower boundary forced events, by providing detailed information on their characteristics. Consequently, this work aims to study the sensitivity of the weather research and forecast ( WRF) model to different topography as well as land-use simulations in an extreme precipitation event. The test case focused on a topographically driven precipitation event over the island of Madeira, which triggered flash floods and mud-slides in the southern parts of the island. Difference fields between simulations were computed, showing that the change in the data sets produced statistically significant changes to the flow, the planetary boundary layer structure and precipitation patterns. Moreover, model results show an improvement in model skill in the windward region for precipitation and in the leeward region for wind, in spite of the nonsignificant enhancement in the overall results with higher-resolution data sets of topography and land use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available