4.1 Article

Differential expression of glypican-3 (GPC3) in lung squamous cell carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma and its clinical significance

Journal

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 10185-10192

Publisher

FUNPEC-EDITORA
DOI: 10.4238/2015.August.28.2

Keywords

Glypican-3; Lung adenocarcinoma; Lung squamous cell carcinoma

Funding

  1. Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning on Pudong New Area [PW2011A-51]
  2. Incidental Subject of Pudong New Area's Key Discipline [PWZx2014-08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we examined the expression of glypican-3 (GPC3) in the 2 most common histological types of lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, and explored the relationship between GPC3 expression and the prognosis of these 2 types of lung cancers. Lung cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues were collected from a total of 60 patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma or lung adenocarcinoma. GPC3 gene and protein expression in the tissue samples was examined using fluorescence-based real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and western blot analysis. In addition, the serological levels of GPC3 protein in lung cancer patients were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The overall expression of GPC3 protein in lung cancer was 45% (21/60). No GPC3 expression was detected in paracancerous lung tissues. Positive expression of GPC3 protein in lung squamous cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that in lung adenocarcinoma (70 vs 20%, P < 0.001). Among GPC3-positive lung squamous cell carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma samples, samples collected from patients with lymph node metastasis and patients with poorly differentiated cancer exhibited more pronounced GPC-3 expression. GPC3 protein expression was significantly higher in lung squamous cell carcinoma than in lung adenocarcinoma. GPC3 may be a candidate marker for detecting lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available