4.3 Article

Community resilience factors among indigenous Sami adolescents: A qualitative study in Northern Norway

Journal

TRANSCULTURAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 651-672

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1363461514532511

Keywords

adolescents; arctic; indigenous; qualitative; resilience; Sami

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20RR061430] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This qualitative study explores community resilience factors within an indigenous Sami community in Northern Norway. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 22 informants, 12 females and 10 males, ranging in age from 13 to 19 years old, 12 of whom had reindeer husbandry affiliation. Data analysis used a modified grounded theory approach and narrative analysis. Interpretation of the data was based on ecological perspectives theory and the identification of possible community resilience factors including Sami language competence, use of recreational and natural resources, and traditional ecological knowledge, such as reindeer husbandry related activities. These cultural factors appear to strengthen adolescents' ethnic identity and pride, which in turn act as potential resilience mechanisms. Land was a significant arena for traditional practices and recreation. The majority of the youth reported support from relationships with extended godparents (faddarat) and extended family (sohka) networks. The fattar network was particularly strong among adolescents with reindeer husbandry affiliations. Native language competence and reindeer husbandry were key components in adolescent social networks. Interconnectedness among the community members and with the environment seemed to promote resilience and well-being. Two factors that excluded adolescents from full community membership and participation were being a nonnative Sami language speaker and the absence of extended Sami family networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available