4.5 Article

Bi-directional Association of Cerebrospinal Fluid Immune Markers with Stage of Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 577-590

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-170887

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; biomarkers; inflammation; pathology

Categories

Funding

  1. McGill University
  2. Canada Research Chair award from the government of Canada
  3. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Sante (FRQ-S)
  4. J.L. Levesque Foundation
  5. Douglas Mental Health University Institute Foundation
  6. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health) [U01AG024904]
  7. DODADNI (Department of Defense) [W81XWH-12-2-0012]
  8. National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  9. AbbVie
  10. Alzheimer's Association
  11. Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  12. Araclon Biotech
  13. BioClinica, Inc.
  14. Biogen
  15. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  16. CereSpir, Inc.
  17. Cogstate
  18. Eisai Inc.
  19. Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  20. Eli Lilly and Company
  21. EuroImmun
  22. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
  23. Genentech, Inc.
  24. Fujirebio
  25. GE Healthcare
  26. IXICO Ltd.
  27. Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.
  28. Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.
  29. Lumosity
  30. Lundbeck
  31. Merck Co., Inc.
  32. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.
  33. NeuroRx Research
  34. Neurotrack Technologies
  35. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  36. Pfizer Inc.
  37. Piramal Imaging
  38. Servier
  39. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
  40. Transition Therapeutics
  41. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  42. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS076794] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  43. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [RF1AG053982] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immune mechanisms may be important in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Yet, studies comparing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma immune marker levels of healthy and demented individuals have yielded conflicting results. We analyzed CSF from 101 members of the parental history-positive PREVENT-AD cohort of healthy aging adults, and 237 participants without dementia from the initial cohort of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI-1). Following recent practice, we used the biomarkers total-tau and amyloid-beta(1-42) to allocate participants from each study into four stages of AD pathogenesis: Stage 0 (no abnormality), Stage 1 (reduced amyloid-beta(1-42)), Stage 2 (reduced amyloid-beta(1-42) and increased total-tau), or Suspected Non-Alzheimer Pathology (elevated total-tau only). Investigating the PREVENT-AD participants' CSF assay results for 19 immune/inflammatory markers, we found six that showed a distinct bi-directional relationship with pathogenetic stage. Relative to Stage 0, these were diminished at Stage 1 but strongly increased at Stage 2. Among the ADNI participants (90 healthy controls and 147 with mild cognitive impairment), we found that 23 of 83 available CSF markers also showed this distinct pattern. These results support recent observations that immune activation may become apparent only after the onset of both amyloid and tau pathologies. Unexpectedly, they also suggest that immune marker activity may diminish along with earliest appearance of amyloid-beta plaque pathology. These findings may explain discordant results from past studies, and suggest the importance of characterizing the extent of AD pathology when comparing clinical groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available