4.7 Article

Talk up or criticize? Customer responses to WOM about competitors during social interactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 12, Pages 2645-2656

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.002

Keywords

Word of mouth received; Word of mouth given; Critical incidents; Social identity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Popular metrics such as the Net Promoter Score (NPS) highlights many benefits of word of mouth (WOM) to firms. Is WOM all it is claimed to be? Building on social identity theory, this research develops a conceptual model of WOM exchange in social settings and tests the model with customer surveys of three service sectors. The findings show that the effects of (1) positive and negative WOM (P/NWOM) received about competitors and (2) perceived presence of critical incidents (PPCIs) on P/NWOM given about own service provider are far from intuitive. Responses to PWOM received counter the suggestions in the NPS literature. The findings also indicate that the best firms can hope for when receiving NWOM about competitors is that their customers remain silent. It is recommended that firms communicate a message that is consistent with the nuanced views expressed by friends in social circles, rather than a uniformly superior positioning. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available