4.7 Article

SrCeO3 as a novel thermal barrier coating candidate for high-temperature applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 740, Issue -, Pages 519-528

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.021

Keywords

Thermal barrier coating; Atmospheric plasma spraying; Thermophysical properties; High-temperature applications

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702244, 51501137]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2017CFB285]
  3. Independent Innovation Foundation of Wuhan University of Technology [2017IVA090]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, perovskite-type SrCeO3 was proposed and investigated as a novel thermal barrier coating (TBC) material for applications above 1200 degrees C. Results indicated that SrCeO3 has a low thermal conductivity, decreasing from 2.84 W/(m.K) to 1.74 W/(m.K) with increasing temperatures from room temperature to 800 degrees C. The thermal expansion coefficients are in a range of 9.67 x 10(-6) K-1-10.6 x 10(-6) K-1, which are comparable to those of the traditional yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ). The results of thermogravimetric-differential scanning calorimeter (TG-DSC) analyses and long-term annealing tests indicated that SrCeO3 has excellent phase stability from room temperature to 1300 degrees C. The above merits suggested that SrCeO3 has a good potential for TBC applications at temperatures higher than 1200 degrees C. Therefore, plasma sprayed SrCeO3 coating was further produced and characterized. However, coated samples failed very early during thermal cycling. The low fracture toughness (1.09 MPa m(1/2)), high sintering activity and coating composition deviation are deemed to be the major factors which lead to the early spallation of SrCeO3 coating. Finally, methods for the improvement of the thermal shock life of SrCeO3 TBC were proposed. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available