4.7 Article

Facile assembly of Ni(OH)(2) nanosheets on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes network as high-performance electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 731, Issue -, Pages 766-773

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.096

Keywords

Electrodeposition; Ni(OH)(2); Chemical vapor deposition; Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes; Oxygen evolution reaction

Funding

  1. University of Science and Technology Beijing
  2. 1000 Talents Recruitment Program of Chinese government
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-TP-16-070A1]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610764]
  5. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing non-noble metal-based electrocatalysts with cost-effective materials for water splitting is critical to clean energy generation and storage. However, the process of water splitting is greatly hindered by the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), which is kinetically sluggish and requires large over-potentials. Herein, we report an active and stable OER catalyst by electrodeposition of ultrathin Ni(OH)(2) nanosheets on three-dimensional interwoven nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes (N-CNTs). The Ni(OH)(2) nanosheets grown on the N-CNTs afforded a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) at the overpotential of only 254 mV, smaller than the commercial IrO2 catalyst. Moreover, the as-prepared catalyst shows long-term durability almost without degradation over 100 h. The excellent OER activity can be ascribed to the unique layered structure of Ni(OH)(2), the ultrathin and interconnected features of the nanosheets, and the three-dimensional (3D) porous conducting network of the N-CNTs. The rational design strategy can be extended to the preparation of other non-precious metal catalysts with enhanced OER performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available