4.7 Article

Well-developed capacitive-capacity of metal-organic framework derived Co3O4 films in Li ion battery anodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 746, Issue -, Pages 277-284

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.285

Keywords

Metal-organic framework; Lithium ion battery; Self-supported anode; Rate capability; Good durability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776052]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [QC2016010]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT. IBRSEM. A. 201407]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous Co3O4 films derived from Co-based metal-organic framework (MOF) are anchored by Ti nanowire arrays to form self-supported electrodes, which realize remarkable rate capability as Li ion battery (LIB) anodes owing to the homogeneous distribution of active grains, conductive scaffold and mass transport channels in them. The MOF films comprising Co-3(HCOO)(6) blocks are anchored on Ti nanowire arrays through a hydrothermal process, then the films are pyrolyzed to porous Co3O4/C films. Scanning electron microscope images reveal the blocks are clenched firmly on Ti substrates by Ti nanowires inserting into them. The LIB battery tests indicate that, thanks to the good adherence, Co3O4 films present outstanding durability (maintaining 2000 cycles at 20 A g(-1) without obvious decay). Furthermore, the carbon scaffold generated from the pyrolysis in inert gas is crucial to the rate capability of Co3O4 self-supported anodes. The homogeneous distribution of carbon in Co3O4 films leads to facilitated electron transport, which can help the films releasing their capacitive potential adequately. This enables the films possessing a capacity of 400 mAh g(-1) at 20 A g(-1), much better than the films from pyrolysis in air (100 mAh g(-1) at 20 A g(-1)). (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available