4.7 Article

Facile synthesis of N and S co-doped graphene sheets as anode materials for high-performance lithium-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 731, Issue -, Pages 235-242

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.043

Keywords

N and S co-doping; Graphene; Thermal annealing; Anode materials; Lithium-ion batteries

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21661008]
  2. Project of Talents Highland of Guangxi province
  3. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2015GXNSFBA139025]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province [2014GXNSFFA118003]
  5. BAGUI scholar program [2014A001]
  6. Science and Technology Research Project of Guangxi Universities [KY2015YB035]
  7. Program for Key Scientific Research of Guangxi Normal University [2014ZD006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple and cost-effective approach is proposed to synthesize the nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) co-doped graphene sheets. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy reveals that the content of N and S atoms is 5.42% and 0.52%, respectively, indicating that N and S have been successfully incorporated into the graphene sheets. The resulting co-doped graphene sheets exhibit excellent electrochemical performance when they are employed as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. A superhigh initial reversible capacity of 1016 mAh g(-1) at a current density of 100 mA g(-)1 was obtained. More significantly, even at an extremely high current density of 20 A g(-1), the as-prepared co-doped graphene still delivers a high capacity of about 250.1 mAh g(-1). The improved electrochemical performance is due to the two-dimensional structure, the large quantity of edge defects, and the synergistic effect of N and S atoms. The results indicate that the co-doped graphene sheets could be promising candidate for high-performance lithiumion batteries materials. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available