4.1 Article

Toll-like receptor 4 promotes fibrosis in bleomycin-induced lung injury in mice

Journal

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 17391-17398

Publisher

FUNPEC-EDITORA
DOI: 10.4238/2015.December.21.8

Keywords

Bleomycin; Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; Lung fibrosis; Toll-like receptor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81070046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The specific role of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis of mice, a model of human idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, has not been characterized. We injected bleomycin intratracheally into TLR4 knockout (TLR4(-/-)) and wild-type (WT) mice. Twenty-one days after injection, mice were sacrificed and their lungs were harvested for pathological, hydroxyproline, mRNA expression, and collagen I analyses. Body weight changes and mortality were observed. Light microscopy showed that lung fibrosis was minimal in TLR4(-/-) compared to that in WT mice on day 21 after bleomycin instillation. The Ashcroft score was significantly lower in TLR4(-/-) than in WT mice (3.667 +/- 0.730 vs 4.945 +/- 0.880, P < 0.05). Hydroxyproline content was significantly lower in TLR4(-/-) than in WT mice on day 21 after bleomycin injection (0.281 +/- 0.022 vs 0.371 +/- 0.047, P < 0.05). Compared to WT mice, bleomycin-treated TLR4(-/-) mice expressed significantly lower type I collagen mRNA levels (mesenchymal marker; 11.069 +/- 2.627 vs 4.589 +/- 1.440, P < 0.05). Collagen I was significantly lower in TLR4(-/-) than in WT mice (0.838 +/- 0.352 vs 2.427 +/- 0.551, P < 0.05). Bleomycin-treated TLR4(-/-) mice had a significantly lower mortality rate on day 21 than WT mice (33 vs 75%, P < 0.05). Body weight reduction was lower in TLR4(-/-) mice than in WT mice; this difference was not statistically significant (-3.735 +/- 5.276 vs -6.698 +/- 3.218, P > 0.05). Thus, bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis is TLR4-dependent and TLR4 promoted fibrosis in bleomycin-challenged mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available