4.0 Review

Features of ovarian cancer in Lynch syndrome (Review)

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 909-916

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2014.397

Keywords

lynch syndrome; ovarian cancer; surveillance; chemoprevention; risk-reducing surgery

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [22591866, 24791718]
  2. Medical Research Encouragement Prize of the Japan Medical Association
  3. Keio Gijyuku Academic Development Fund
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24791718, 22591866] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lynch syndrome is a hereditary ovarian cancer with a prevalence of 0.9-2.7%. Lynch syndrome accounts for 10-15% of hereditary ovarian cancers, while hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome accounts for 65-75% of these cancers. The lifetime risk for ovarian cancer in families with Lynch syndrome is similar to 8%, which is lower than colorectal and endometrial cancers, and ovarian cancer is not listed in the Amsterdam Criteria II. More than half of sporadic ovarian cancers are diagnosed in stage III or IV, but >= 80% of ovarian cancers in Lynch syndrome are diagnosed in stage I or II. Ovarian cancers in Lynch syndrome mostly have non-serous histology and different properties from those of sporadic ovarian cancers. A screening method for ovarian cancers in Lynch syndrome has yet to be established and clinical studies of prophylactic administration of oral contraceptives are not available. However, molecular profiles at the genetic level indicate that ovarian cancer in Lynch syndrome has a more favorable prognosis than sporadic ovarian cancer. Inhibitors of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of the rapamycin pathway and anti-epidermal growth factor antibodies may have efficacy for the disease. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review focusing on ovarian cancer in Lynch syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available