4.8 Article

Linking a storyline with multiple models: A cross-scale study of the UK power system transition

Journal

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 26-42

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.08.018

Keywords

Scenarios; Storylines; Cross-scale; Quantitative models; Simulation; Energy; Environment; Climate change; Transition pathways

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K005316/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/K005316/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

State-of-the-art scenario exercises in the energy and environment fields argue for combining qualitative storylines with quantitative modelling. This paper proposes an approach for linking a highly detailed storyline with multiple, diverse models. This approach is illustrated through a cross-scale study of the UK power system transition until 2050. The storyline, called Central Coordination, is linked with insights from six power system models and two appraisal techniques. First, the storyline is 'translated' into harmonised assumptions on power system targets for the models. Then, a new concept called the landscape of models is introduced. This landscape helps to map the key fields of expertise of individual models, including their temporal, spatial and disciplinary foci. The storyline is then assessed based on the cross-scale modelling results. While the storyline is important for transmitting information about governance and the choices of key actors, many targets aspired in it are inconsistent with modelling results. The storyline overestimates demand reduction levels, uptake of marine renewables and irreplaceability of carbon capture and storage. It underestimates the supply-demand balancing challenge, the need for back-up capacity and the role of nuclear power and interconnectors with Europe. Thus, iteratively linking storylines and models is key. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights resented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available