4.7 Article

Digestibility of (Poly)phenols and Antioxidant Activity in Raw and Cooked Cactus Cladodes (Opuntia ficus-indica)

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 66, Issue 23, Pages 5832-5844

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01167

Keywords

polyphenols; cactus; Opuntia ficus-indica; heat treatment; in vitro gastrointestinal digestion; bioaccessibility

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2014-52636-P]
  2. Association of Friends of the University of Navarra
  3. IFAPA
  4. ESF
  5. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness Juan de la Cierva-Incorporacion [FJCI-2015-26433]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to investigate whether heat treatment applied to cactus cladodes influences the bioaccessibility of their (poly)phenolic compounds after simulated gastric and intestinal digestion. A total of 45 (poly)phenols were identified and quantified in raw and cooked cactus cladodes by ultra high performance liquid chromatography photodiode array detector high resolution mass spectrometry. Both flavonoids (60-68% total), mainly isorhamnetin derivatives, and phenolic acids (32-40%) with eucomic acids as the predominant ones significantly (p < 0.05) increased with microwaving and griddling processes. After in vitro gastrointestinal digestion, 5S-64% of the total (poly)phenols of cooked cactus cladodes remained bioaccessible versus 44% in raw samples. Furthermore, digestive conditions and enzymes degraded or retained more flavonoids (37-63% bioaccessibility) than phenolic acids (56-87% bioaccessibility). Microwaved cactus cladodes contributed the highest amount of (poy)phenols (143.54 mg/g dm) after gastrointestinal process, followed by griddled samples (133.98 mg/g dm), showing the highest antioxidant capacity. Additionally, gastrointestinal digestion induced isomerizations among the three stereoisomeric forms of piscidic and eucomic acids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available