4.7 Article

Quickly Screening for Potential alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitors from Guava Leaves Tea by Bioaffinity Ultrafiltration Coupled with HPLC-ESI-TOF/MS Method

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages 1576-1582

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05280

Keywords

guava leaves tea; alpha-glucosidase inhibitors; quick screening; bioaffinity ultrafiltration; HPLC-ESI-TOF/MS

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province, China [2016A020210011, 2017B020207003]
  2. Special fund for Agricultural Science and Technology Research Project of Jiangmen City, China [20150160008347]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Guava leaves tea (GLT) has a potential antihyperglycemic effect. Nevertheless, it is unclear which compound plays a key role in reducing blood sugar. In this study, GLT extract (IC50 = 19.37 +/- 0.21 mu g/mL) exhibited a stronger inhibitory potency against alpha-glucosidase than did acarbose (positive control) at IC50 = 178.52 1.37 mu g/mL. To rapidly identify the specific alpha-glucosidase inhibitor components from GLT, an approach based on bioaffinity ultrafiltration combined with high performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (BAUF-HPLC-ESITOF/MS) was developed. Under the optimal bioaffinity ultrafiltration conditions, 11 corresponding potential alpha-glucosidase inhibitors with high affinity degrees (ADs) were screened and identified from the GLT extract. Quercetin (IC50 = 4.51 +/- 0.71 fig/mL) and procyanidin B3 (IC50 = 28.67 +/- 5.81 mu g/mL) were determined to be primarily responsible for the antihyperglycemic effect, which further verified the established screening method. Moreover, structure activity relationships were discussed. In conclusion, the BAUF-HPLC-ESI-TOF/MS method could be applied to determine the potential aglucosidase inhibitors from complex natural products quickly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available