4.7 Article

Childhood disadvantage, education, and psychological distress in adulthood: A three-wave population-based study

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 229, Issue -, Pages 206-212

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.051

Keywords

Childhood adversity; Socioeconomic status; Socioeconomic position; Longitudinal; Psychological well-being; Emotional distress; Social epidemiology; Anxiety; Depression

Funding

  1. University of Tromso

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We assessed the mediating role of education in the association between childhood disadvantage and psychological distress in adulthood using longitudinal data collected in three waves, from 1994 to 2008, in the framework of the Tromso Study (N = 4530), a cohort that is representative of men and women from Tromso. Methods: Education was measured at a mean age of 54.7 years, and psychological distress in adulthood was measured at a mean age of 61.7 years. Ordinary least square regression analysis was used to assess the associations between childhood disadvantage, education, and psychological distress in adulthood. The indirect effects and the proportion (%) of indirect effects of childhood disadvantage (via education) on psychological distress in adulthood were assessed by mediation analysis. Results: Childhood disadvantage was associated with lower education and higher psychological distress in adulthood (p < 0.05). Lower education was associated with a higher psychological distress in adulthood (p < 0.05). A minor proportion (7.51%, p < 0.05) of the association between childhood disadvantage and psychological distress in adulthood was mediated by education. Limitations: Childhood disadvantages were measured retrospectively. Conclusion: The association between childhood disadvantage and psychological distress in adulthood is primarily independent of education.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available