4.1 Article

Expression and clinical significance of PIWIL2 in hilar cholangiocarcinoma tissues and cell lines

Journal

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 7053-7061

Publisher

FUNPEC-EDITORA
DOI: 10.4238/2015.June.26.15

Keywords

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma; PIWI-like protein 2; Prognosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81071998, 81372239]
  2. Hubei Province Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [2012FFA012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between PIWI-like protein 2 (PIWIL2) and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis after radical resection. To accomplish this, we analyzed PIWIL2 expression in hilar cholangiocarcinoma tissues and cell lines. PIWIL2 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry in 41 hilar cholangiocarcinoma samples and 10 control tissues. Western blotting and immunocytofluorescence were used to investigate PIWIL2 expression in the cholangiocarcinoma cell line QBC939 and the bile duct epithelial cell line HIBEpic. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method for hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent radical resection. PIWIL2 expression was significantly higher in the hilar cholangiocarcinoma tissues and QBC939 cells than in control tissues and HIBEpic cells, respectively (P < 0.05). Poorly and moderately differentiated cholangiocarcinoma tissues had significantly higher PIWIL2 expression than well-differentiated tissues (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis demonstrated that high PIWIL2 expression was associated with shorter survival time after radical resection (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that PI-WIL2 expression was an independent prognostic factor after radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (P < 0.05). PIWIL2 expression was also associated with tumor-node-metastasis stage and differentiation. PIWIL2 was an independent prognostic factor after radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available