4.7 Article

Aberrant resting-state cerebellar blood flow in major depression

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages 227-231

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.028

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Cerebellum; Major depression; Arterial spin labeling; Voxel-based morphometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Abnormal cortical cerebral blood flow and gray matter volume have been frequently reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). In contrast, although the role of the cerebellum in MDD pathophysiology has attracted considerable interest more recently, studies investigating both functional and structural aspects of cerebellar integrity are scarce. Methods: In this study, we used structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate cerebellar volume and regional cerebellar blood flow (rCBF) at rest in clinically acute MDD patients (n = 22) and healthy controls (n = 18). We acquired high-resolution structural images at 3 T together with perfusion images obtained with continuous arterial spin labeling. Cerebellar structure and function were investigated using cerebellum-optimized analysis techniques. Results: Markedly increased rCBF was found in bilateral cerebellar areas VIIa and VIIIb (p < 0.05 family-wise-error [FWE] corrected). Significant differences in cerebellar volume between patients and controls were not found (p < 0.05, FWE-corrected). Left cerebellar area VIIa perfusion was significantly associated with depressive symptoms, as measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Limitations: Potential limitations of this study include the modest sample size, the cross-sectional design, the lack of task-related imaging and the heterogeneity of drug treatment. Conclusions: The data suggest contributions of affective cerebellar regions to MDD pathophysiology and symptom expression. While cerebellar perfusion at rest is compromised in MDD, cerebellar volume seems to be less affected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available