4.7 Article

The development of a morphological unplanned settlement index using very-high-resolution (VHR) imagery

Journal

COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 138-152

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.07.012

Keywords

Unplanned settlement index; Urban morphology; VHR imagery; Image segmentation; Spatial metrics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spatial metrics combined with spectral information extracted from very-high-resolution (VHR) imagery allow quantification of the general spatial characteristics of urban areas, as well as specific morphological features (i.e., density, size, and pattern) of unplanned settlements. Such morphological features are visible in VHR imagery, but they are challenging to quantify. Still, quantification of the morphological differences between planned and unplanned areas is an important step towards automatic extraction of unplanned areas from VHR imagery. In this work, we discuss how image segmentation assists in the extraction of homogenous urban patches (HUPs), and use spatial metrics to quantify the morphological differences between planned and unplanned HUPs. A set of spatial metrics meaningful to describe morphological features of unplanned areas is selected and combined into an unplanned settlement index (USI) using a multi-criteria evaluation approach. Two case study areas are used to test the USI, i.e., Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and New Delhi, India. The ability of the developed USI to extract unplanned areas is confirmed via visual comparison with existing land use data, and a quantitative accuracy assessment shows that areas of high USI coincide well with unplanned areas in the reference data. The quantitative accuracy assessment presents an accuracy of greater than 70% for five selected test areas in both cities. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available