4.7 Article

Cognitive abilities in first-degree relatives of individuals with bipolar disorder

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 225, Issue -, Pages 147-152

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.029

Keywords

Cognition; Bipolar disorder; Endophenotype; Verbal learning; Executive functioning; Problem-solving; Heritability; Familial risk

Funding

  1. Australian Rotary Health/Bipolar Expedition
  2. Helen McPherson Smith Trust
  3. NHMRC [1088785]
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1088785] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although the study of cognition in first degree relatives (FDRs) is not new, findings in this group are still somewhat inconsistent and much of the research examining FDR populations include individuals under the age of 25, who are arguably still at significant risk to go on to develop BD. The present study aimed to establish the value of cognitive performance as a genuine endophenotypic marker of familial risk for bipolar disorder (BD), by examining cognition in FDRs aged 25 years or older. Methods: The current study compared the cognitive performance of 27 unaffected FDRs to 47 healthy controls (HCs) and 28 BD patients using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Results: Results indicated that FDRs had impaired verbal learning performance, as well as selective impairments on a measure of speed of processing; and a measure of spatial working memory compared to HC. Limitations: Limitations relate to the potential insensitivity of some of the tests in the MCCB for detecting cognitive deficits that have been previously noted in BD and FDR samples using other batteries. Conclusions: Findings from this study implicate verbal learning, processing speed and working memory performance as promising candidate endophenotypes of familial risk for BD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available