Journal
NATURE + CULTURE
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 316-343Publisher
BERGHAHN JOURNALS
DOI: 10.3167/nc.2014.090305
Keywords
boundary objects; energy; evidence; policy; role of knowledge; sustainability
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article examines the various roles that indicators, as boundary objects, can play as a science-based evidence for policy processes. It presents two case studies from the EU-funded POINT project that analyzed the use and influence of two highly different types of indicators: composite indicators of sustainable development at the EU level and energy indicators in the UK. In both cases indicators failed as direct input to policy making, yet they generated various types of conceptual and political use and influence. The composite sustainable development indicators served as framework indicators, helping to advocate a specific vision of sustainable development, whereas the energy indicators produced various types of indirect influence, including through the process of indicator elaboration. Our case studies demonstrate the relatively limited importance of the characteristics and quality of indicators in determining the role of indicators, as compared with the crucial importance of user factors (characteristics of policy actors) and policy factors (policy context).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available