4.2 Article

Factors Associated With Initiation of Biologics in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis in an Urban Asian City A PRESPOND Study

Journal

JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 59-64

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000762

Keywords

Asia; axial spondyloarthritis; biologics; factors; initiation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine if patients' sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes were associated with biologics initiation in patients with axial spondyloarthritis in Singapore. Methods: Data from a dedicated registry from a tertiary referral center in Singapore from January 2011 to July 2016 were used. Initiation of first biologicswas themain outcome of interest. Logistic regression analyseswere used to explore the association of various factors on biologics initiation. Results: Of 189 eligible patients (aged 37.7 +/- 13.3 years; 76.2% were males), 30 (15.9 %) were started on biologics during follow-up. In the multivariable analysis model, age (odds ratio [OR]; 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.98; p < 0.01), mental component summary score of Short-Form 36 Health Survey (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.03-0.89; p = 0.04), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04; p = 0.02), presence of peptic ulcer disease (OR, 10.4; 95% CI, 2.21-48.8; p < 0.01), and lack of good response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 1.63-12.1; p < 0.01) were found to be associated with biologics initiation. Conclusions: Age, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, mental component summary score, comorbidities of peptic ulcer disease, and responsiveness to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugswere associated with biologics initiation. It is essential that clinicians recognize these factors in order to optimize therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available