4.6 Article

Should We Perform an Immediate Coronary Angiogram in All Patients After Cardiac Arrest? Insights From a Large French Registry

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 249-256

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.011

Keywords

cardiac arrest; coronary angiogram; percutaneous coronary intervention; prognosis; sudden death

Funding

  1. Boston Scientific
  2. Abbott
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Servier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the relationship between an immediate invasive strategy and survival after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of presumed cardiac cause, according to prognosis evaluated on hospital arrival. BACKGROUND An immediate coronary angiogram (CAG) may be associated with better outcome after OHCA in neurologically preserved patients but could be futile in other cases. METHODS From May 2011 to May 2015, we collected data for all patients admitted in hospital after OHCA in Paris and its suburbs (France). Risk of in-hospital death was retrospectively calculated using the validated Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis score, which includes age, setting, initial rhythm, durations from collapse to basic life support and from basic life support to return of spontaneous circulation, pH, and epinephrine dose. Independent predictors of survival at discharge (including immediate CAG) were assessed in multivariate logistic regression in each of the 3 pre-defined subgroups of Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis score: low risk (<150 points), medium risk (150 to 200 points), and high risk (>200 points) for in-hospital death. RESULTS A total of 1,410 patients were included and overall survival rate at hospital discharge was 32%. Distribution in the low-, medium-, and high-risk Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis subgroups was 667 (47%), 469 (33%), and 274 patients (20%), respectively. The rate of early CAG was 86%, 66%, and 47% in the low-, medium-, and high-risk subgroups, respectively (p < 0.001). Early invasive strategy was independently associated with better survival in low-risk patients (odds ratio: 2.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.4 to 3.9; p = 0.001), but not in medium-risk (p = 0.55) and high-risk (p = 0.43) patients. Sensitivity analysis found consistent results. CONCLUSIONS In cardiac arrest patients, our results suggest that investigations regarding early CAG after OHCA should focus on patients with preserved neurological status. (C) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available