Journal
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages 626-634Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.11.009
Keywords
atrial fibrillation; coronary artery; percutaneous coronary intervention; randomized controlled trials as topic; rivaroxaban
Categories
Funding
- Janssen Scientific Affairs
- Bayer
- Sanofi
- Institut Servier
- Federation Francaise de Cardiologie
- AstraZeneca
- Johnson Johnson
- Janssen
- Portola
- Janssen Research
- Abbott Laboratories
- CardioKinetix
- Spectranetics
- Beth Israel Deaconness
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- CSL Behring
- Eli Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Daiichi Sankyo
- Bayer/Janssen
Ask authors/readers for more resources
OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess whether there were significant interactions of procedural access strategies and lesion characteristics with bleeding and ischemic events among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban or warfarin following a percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND Among stented AF patients, the impact of procedural access strategies or lesion characteristics on antithrombotic safety and efficacy outcomes is unclear. METHODS In the PIONEER AF-PCI (An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study Exploring Two Treatment Strategies of Rivaroxaban and a Dose-Adjusted Oral Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment Strategy in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, 2,124 patients were randomized to 3 groups and followed for 12 months: 1) rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily plus a P2Y(12) inhibitor (n = 709); 2) rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice a day plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (n = 709); and 3) dose-adjusted warfarin plus DAPT (n = 706). Kaplan-Meier rates of clinically significant bleeding and major adverse cardiovascular events were compared between treatments stratified by subgroups of procedure type and lesion characteristics. RESULTS Compared with warfarin, both rivaroxaban regimens consistently reduced clinically significant bleeding across subgroups of radial versus femoral arterial access and by vascular closure device use. Treatment effect of rivaroxaban on major adverse cardiovascular events did not vary when stratified by ischemia-driven revascularization, urgency of revascularization, location of culprit artery, presence of bifurcation lesion, presence of thrombus, type, and length of stent or number of stents (interaction p > 0.05 for all subgroups). CONCLUSIONS Among stented AF patients requiring long-term oral anticoagulation, there was no effect modification by procedure or lesion characteristics of either clinically significant bleeding or major adverse cardiovascular events. Rivaroxaban-based therapy was superior to warfarin plus DAPT in bleeding outcomes regardless of the type of stent or arterial access during the index coronary revascularization. (A Study Exploring Two Strategies of Rivaroxaban [JNJ39039039; BAY-59-7939] and One of Oral Vitamin K Antagonist in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PIONEER AF-PCI]; NCT01830543) (c) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available