4.2 Article

The impact of CDA A79C gene polymorphisms on the response and hematologic toxicity in gemcitabine-treated patients: A meta-analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages E224-E232

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.5301/jbm.5000076

Keywords

CDA; Gemcitabine Hematologic toxicity; Response

Funding

  1. Shandong province science and technology development projects [2012GSF11845]
  2. national natural fund project [81372530]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To investigate the impact of the cytidine deaminase (CDA) A79C polymorphism on both the response to gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and the risk of hematologic toxicities in patients bearing any kind of cancer taking gemcitabine. Methods: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched from the first available article to January 2013. Eligible studies included clinical trials that contained the keywords gemcitabine or cytidine deaminase and information about response rate of NSCLC patients or hematologic toxicities in patients with any kind of cancer. Relative risk (RR) of different genotypes and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: A total of 7 articles (623 patients from 6 studies) were included. The results showed that patients with wild type CDA (AA and AC) had a significantly lower rate of severe anemia than the homozygote mutant type CC (RR=0.308; 95%CI, 0.113-0.021, p=0.021). However, the rate of severe neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and the response rate were identical between different CDA genotypes. Conclusion: The A79C CDA polymorphism did not show a significant impact on the response rate to gemcitabine in NSCLC patients, while the wild type CDA genotype was indeed correlated to a lower rate of incidence of severe anemia in patients taking gemcitabine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available