4.4 Article

The Double-Strand Break Landscape of Meiotic Chromosomes Is Shaped by the Paf1 Transcription Elongation Complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 202, Issue 2, Pages 497-+

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.177287

Keywords

meiosis; recombination; H3K4 methylation; PAF; Rtf1; double-strand breaks

Funding

  1. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [22125001, 22125002]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. JSPS through the Next Generation World-Leading Researchers program
  4. National Institutes of Health [GM088248]
  5. March Dimes research grant [6-FY13-105]
  6. Indian government
  7. Institute for Protein Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Histone modification is a critical determinant of the frequency and location of meiotic double-strand breaks (DSBs), and thus recombination. Set1-dependent histone H3K4 methylation and Dot1-dependent H3K79 methylation play important roles in this process in budding yeast. Given that the RNA polymerase II associated factor 1 complex, Paf1C, promotes both types of methylation, we addressed the role of the Paf1C component, Rtf1, in the regulation of meiotic DSB formation. Similar to a set1 mutation, disruption of RTF1 decreased the occurrence of DSBs in the genome. However, the rtf1 set1 double mutant exhibited a larger reduction in the levels of DSBs than either of the single mutants, indicating independent contributions of Rtf1 and Set1 to DSB formation. Importantly, the distribution of DSBs along chromosomes in the rtf1 mutant changed in a manner that was different from the distributions observed in both set1 and set1 dot1 mutants, including enhanced DSB formation at some DSB-cold regions that are occupied by nucleosomes in wild-type cells. These observations suggest that Rtf1, and by extension the Paf1C, modulate the genomic DSB landscape independently of H3K4 methylation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available