4.4 Article

Inference Under a Wright-Fisher Model Using an Accurate Beta Approximation

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 201, Issue 3, Pages 1133-U590

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.179606

Keywords

Wright-Fisher; beta; pure genetic drift; linear evolutionary pressures; divergence times

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/ERC) [311341]
  2. Danish Research Council [DFF-400200382]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The large amount and high quality of genomic data available today enable, in principle, accurate inference of evolutionary histories of observed populations. The Wright-Fisher model is one of the most widely used models for this purpose. It describes the stochastic behavior in time of allele frequencies and the influence of evolutionary pressures, such as mutation and selection. Despite its simple mathematical formulation, exact results for the distribution of allele frequency (DAF) as a function of time are not available in closed analytical form. Existing approximations build on the computationally intensive diffusion limit or rely on matching moments of the DAF. One of the moment-based approximations relies on the beta distribution, which can accurately describe the DAF when the allele frequency is not close to the boundaries (0 and 1). Nonetheless, under a Wright-Fisher model, the probability of being on the boundary can be positive, corresponding to the allele being either lost or fixed. Here we introduce the beta with spikes, an extension of the beta approximation that explicitly models the loss and fixation probabilities as two spikes at the boundaries. We show that the addition of spikes greatly improves the quality of the approximation. We additionally illustrate, using both simulated and real data, how the beta with spikes can be used for inference of divergence times between populations with comparable performance to an existing state-of-the-art method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available