4.6 Article

THE APOKASC CATALOG: AN ASTEROSEISMIC AND SPECTROSCOPIC JOINT SURVEY OF TARGETS IN THE KEPLER FIELDS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 215, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/215/2/19

Keywords

catalogs; stars: abundances; stars: fundamental parameters; stars: oscillations (including pulsations); surveys

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-1211673, AST-1105930, AST11-09888]
  2. NASA Postdoctoral Program at Ames Research Center
  3. NASA [NNX14AB92G, NNX13AE70G, NNX12AE17G]
  4. Australian Research Council
  5. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF106]
  6. European Research Council [267864]
  7. European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)/ERC (StellarAges) [338251]
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB 963/1]
  9. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  10. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0027910]
  11. MICINN [AYA2011-24704]
  12. ESF EUROCORES Program EuroGENESIS (MICINN) [EUI2009-04170]
  13. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY 0822648]
  14. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AYA-2011-27754]
  15. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  16. National Science Foundation
  17. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  18. University of Arizona
  19. Brazilian Participation Group
  20. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  21. Carnegie Mellon University
  22. University of Florida
  23. French Participation Group
  24. German Participation Group
  25. Harvard University
  26. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  27. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  28. Johns Hopkins University
  29. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  30. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  31. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  32. New Mexico State University
  33. New York University
  34. Ohio State University
  35. Pennsylvania State University
  36. University of Portsmouth
  37. Princeton University
  38. Spanish Participation Group
  39. University of Tokyo
  40. University of Utah
  41. Vanderbilt University
  42. University of Virginia
  43. University of Washington
  44. Yale University
  45. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 23608] Funding Source: researchfish
  46. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  47. Division Of Physics [1430152] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  48. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  49. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1211144, 1211673] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first APOKASC catalog of spectroscopic and asteroseismic properties of 1916 red giants observed in the Kepler fields. The spectroscopic parameters provided from the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment project are complemented with asteroseismic surface gravities, masses, radii, and mean densities determined by members of the Kepler Asteroseismology Science Consortium. We assess both random and systematic sources of error and include a discussion of sample selection for giants in the Kepler fields. Total uncertainties in the main catalog properties are of the order of 80 K in Teff, 0.06 dex in [M/ H], 0.014 dex in log g, and 12% and 5% in mass and radius, respectively; these reflect a combination of systematic and random errors. Asteroseismic surface gravities are substantially more precise and accurate than spectroscopic ones, and we find good agreement between their mean values and the calibrated spectroscopic surface gravities. There are, however, systematic underlying trends with Teff and log g. Our effective temperature scale is between 0 and 200 K cooler than that expected from the infrared flux method, depending on the adopted extinction map, which provides evidence for a lower value on average than that inferred for the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC). We find a reasonable correspondence between the photometric KIC and spectroscopic APOKASC metallicity scales, with increased dispersion in KIC metallicities as the absolute metal abundance decreases, and offsets in T-eff and log g consistent with those derived in the literature. We present mean fitting relations between APOKASC and KIC observables and discuss future prospects, strengths, and limitations of the catalog data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available