4.4 Article

VO(2)max Testing in Trail Runners: Is There a Specific Exercise Test Protocol?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 456-461

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-0577-4851

Keywords

trail running; exercise test; performance; VO2max

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trail running places specific physiological demands on the human body due to its uphill and downhill running sections. We developed and investigated a more sport-specific trail exercise test protocol (inclination and speed incremental protocol), and compared it to two standard exercise test protocols (horizontal step and ramp protocol) in thirteen highly trained trail runners (age 31 +/- 6 years, height 179 +/- 6.4cm, weight 69.2 +/- 7.9kg, BMI 21.6 +/- 2.1kg/m(2)). The maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max) measured during the trail test (62.5 +/- 5.9mlkg(-1)min(-1), [95% CI: 59.0-66.1]) was significantly higher compared to both the step test (60.1 +/- 5.3mlkg(-1)min(-1), [95% CI: 56.8-63.3], p=0.024) and the ramp test (59.7 +/- 5.5mlkg(-1)min (-1), [95% CI: 56.4-63.0], p=0.028). Time to task failure was significantly shorter in the trail test (557 +/- 73s, [95% CI: 512-601]) compared to both the step test (1378 +/- 152s, [95% CI: 1286-1470], p<0.001) and the ramp test (605 +/- 95, [95% CI: 547-662], p<0.001). Other physiological measurements obtained were similar. The trail test was the preferred choice in our group of trail runners. This study supports the implementation of the trail test in practice, and recommends that its validity be evaluated further.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available