4.7 Article

Dec-MCTS: Decentralized planning for multi-robot active perception

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 2-3, Pages 316-337

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0278364918755924

Keywords

Decentralized Monte Carlo tree search; multi-robot systems; decentralized planning; active perception; variational methods

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP140104203]
  2. Australian Centre for Field Robotics
  3. New South Wales State Government
  4. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technologies, The University of Sydney, under the Faculty Research Cluster Program
  5. University of Sydney's International Research Collaboration Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a decentralized variant of Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) that is suitable for a variety of tasks in multi-robot active perception. Our algorithm allows each robot to optimize its own actions by maintaining a probability distribution over plans in the joint-action space. Robots periodically communicate a compressed form of their search trees, which are used to update the joint distribution using a distributed optimization approach inspired by variational methods. Our method admits any objective function defined over robot action sequences, assumes intermittent communication, is anytime, and is suitable for online replanning. Our algorithm features a new MCTS tree expansion policy that is designed for our planning scenario. We extend the theoretical analysis of standard MCTS to provide guarantees for convergence rates to the optimal payoff sequence. We evaluate the performance of our method for generalized team orienteering and online active object recognition using real data, and show that it compares favorably to centralized MCTS even with severely degraded communication. These examples demonstrate the suitability of our algorithm for real-world active perception with multiple robots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available