4.7 Article

Post-zygotic Point Mutations Are an Underrecognized Source of De Novo Genomic Variation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages 67-74

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [916-14-043, 916-12-095, SH-271-13]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [DENOVO 281964]
  3. Radboud University Medical Center grant
  4. Fondazione Telethon Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

De novo mutations are recognized both as an important source of genetic variation and as a prominent cause of sporadic disease in humans. Mutations identified as de novo are generally assumed to have occurred during gametogenesis and, consequently, to be present as germline events in an individual. Because Sanger sequencing does not provide the sensitivity to reliably distinguish somatic from germline mutations, the proportion of de novo mutations that occur somatically rather than in the germline remains largely unknown. To determine the contribution of post-zygotic events to de novo mutations, we analyzed a set of 107 de novo mutations in SO parent-offspring trios. Using four different sequencing techniques, we found that 7 (6.5%) of these presumed gemiline di novo mutations were in fact present as mosaic mutations in the blood of the offspring and were therefore likely to have occurred post-zygotically. Furthermore, genome-wide analysis of de novo variants in the proband led to the identification of 4/4,081 variants that were also detectable in the blood of one of the parents, implying parental mosaicism as the origin of these variants. Thus, our results show that an important fraction of de novo mutations presumed to be germline in fact occurred either post-zygotically in the offspring or were inherited as a consequence of low-level mosaicism in one of the parents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available