4.6 Article

Comparing Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators: How well is total factor productivity approximated?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS
Volume 195, Issue -, Pages 311-318

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.010

Keywords

Luenberger indicator; Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen indicator; TFP

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [201308070020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We empirically compare both the popular Luenberger indicator with the less popular Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator on an agricultural panel data set of Chinese provinces over the years 1997-2014. In particular, we test for the differences in distribution when comparing these indicators. These tests are crucial to answer the question to which extent the Luenberger indicator can approximate the Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator that has a Total Factor Productivity (TFP) interpretation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available