4.7 Article

Urokinase injection-triggered clearance enhancement of a 4-arm PEG-conjugated 64Cu-bombesin analog tetramer: A novel approach for the improvement of PET imaging contrast

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 545, Issue 1-2, Pages 206-214

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.05.014

Keywords

Urokinase; Positron-emission tomography; Imaging contrast; Multi-arm polyethylene glycol; Bombesin analog; Cancer imaging

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [25710011]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25710011] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radiolabeled antibodies, polyethylene glycol-conjugated (PEGylated) peptides, liposomes, and other materials were investigated as positron-emission tomography (PET) probes. These substances accumulate in tumors but often remain too long in circulation. We investigated the combination of intravenous urokinase injection and its substrate linker as a triggered radioisotope clearance enhancement system to improve imaging contrast. To this end, we synthesized a four-arm PEGylated Cu-64-bombesin analog tetramer with a urokinase substrate linker. In mouse blood, it was almost perfectly cleaved and degraded into smaller radioactive fragments in vitro with urokinase (>= 20,000 IUmL). In mouse blood circulation, similar to 50-65% of the probe was rapidly degraded after the urokinase injection and the radioactive fragments were eliminated mainly from the kidney. In contrast, tumor radioactivity levels did not change, and therefore, the tumors were clearly visualized. The tumor/blood ratio, an indicator of imaging contrast, increased 2.5 times, while elimination of the radioisotope from the blood was enhanced. This approach has the potential to improve imaging contrast using various PET probes. It could also shorten the time required to obtain sufficient contrast and decrease patient radiation exposure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available