4.7 Article

Oral hepatitis B vaccine: chitosan or glucan based delivery systems for efficient HBsAg immunization following subcutaneous priming

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 535, Issue 1-2, Pages 261-271

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.11.009

Keywords

Hepatitis B; Oral vaccine; Alginate-coated chitosan particles; Glucan particles

Funding

  1. FEDER European funds through the Programa Operacional Fatores de Competividade -COMPETE
  2. FCT-Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [PTDC/SAU-FAR/115044/2009, PEst-C/SAU/LA0001/2011, UID/NEU/04539/2013, SFRH/BD/96167/2013]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/96167/2013, PTDC/SAU-FAR/115044/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The World Health Organization encourages the development of oral formulations to simplify their transport, storage and administration in poor countries, and to facilitate an effective immunization program to prevent sexually transmitted hepatitis B. Thus, two distinct and promising delivery systems were developed: recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) encapsulated into alginate-coated chitosan particles (AlgChiPs) and into glucan particles (GPs) mainly composed of beta-1,3-D-glucan. In vitro preliminary studies showed that both could be internalized by peripheral blood mononuclear cells and murine Peyer's patches, an imperative aspect regarding oral immunization. Chitosan particles (ChiPs) have shown interesting immunostimulating properties as mast cells activators. Vaccination studies reveal that three oral immunizations induced serum anti-HBsAg Immunoglobulin G (IgG) in 60 % of the animals and anti-HBsAg secretory IgA in faeces for both formulations. When subcutaneous (SC) priming was done, followed by two oral boosts, all mice were responder and much higher serum anti-HBsAg IgG titers were observed, besides mucosal protective immunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available